|
|
Judge Protects 2 Medical Pot Users
URL: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v04/n745/a02.html
Newshawk: Support Your Favorite ORG http://www.drugsense.org/donate.htm#support_dpc
Pubdate: Wed, 19 May 2004
Source: Oakland Tribune, The (CA)
Copyright: 2004 MediaNews Group, Inc. and ANG Newspapers
Contact: triblet@angnewspapers.com
Website: http://www.oaklandtribune.com/
Details: http://www.mapinc.org/media/314
Cited: Raich v. Ashcroft http://angeljustice.org/
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/people/Angel+Raich
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/people/Diane+Monson
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/mmj.htm
(Cannabis - Medicinal)
Bookmark: http://www.mapinc.org/find?115
(Cannabis - California)
JUDGE PROTECTS 2 MEDICAL POT USERS
SAN FRANCISCO -- A federal judge in San Francisco, following
instructions of a U.S. appeals court, has issued a preliminary
injunction shielding two ill women from federal prosecution for using
medical marijuana.
U.S. District Judge Martin Jenkins issued the injunction
protecting Angel Raich of Oakland and Diane Monson of Oroville on
Friday.
The order bars officials of the U.S. Justice Department and Drug
Enforcement Administration from arresting or prosecuting the women for
using medical marijuana. The officials also are forbidden to seize
the patients' marijuana or seek civil sanctions against them.
The preliminary injunction was ordered by the 9th U.S. Circuit
Court of Appeals in San Francisco in December.
The circuit court ruling was a rare federal court victory for medical
marijuana advocates in the conflict between federal law criminalizing
marijuana and a 1996 California voter initiative that allows patients to
use marijuana upon a doctor's recommendation.
Meanwhile, Raich said Tuesday, "I am elated knowing that I am the
first medical cannabis patient to be protected by the judicial branch of
government."
Raich suffers from an inoperable brain tumor, chronic pain and severe
weight loss, and Monson suffers from a degenerative spine disease that
results in chronic back pain and muscle spasms.
But the federal appeals court last year based its ruling in the Raich
case on a different legal ground -- the power of Congress to regulate
interstate commerce.
The appeals court said the U.S. Controlled Substances Act, which
is based on the commerce-regulation power, shouldn't apply to the two
women because their marijuana growing and use were noncommercial and
conducted within California.
The U.S. Justice Department has appealed that decision to the U.S.
Supreme Court.
Both say they need marijuana to alleviate their pain and their symptoms.
|
|